非姦淫離婚的悔改之路｜Repentance After Divorce Without Adultery
✋ 核心問題
如果一對夫妻不是因姦淫而離婚，他們要如何悔改？
**Core Question**
If a couple divorces for reasons other than adultery, how can they repent?
———
✊ 基本共識（聖經立場）
神恨惡離婚（瑪拉基書 2:16）
再婚的唯一例外：姦淫（馬太福音 19:9）
結論：
若非因姦淫離婚，在神眼中仍與原配偶有婚約關係。
**Biblical Foundation**
God hates divorce (Malachi 2:16)
The only exception for remarriage is adultery (Matthew 19:9)
Conclusion:
If the divorce is not due to adultery, the marriage bond still remains before God.
———
✊ 主要觀點整理
一、T.A. 的觀點
1）若因暴力等原因分開
可以「分開生活」，但不是合法再婚的理由
2）若已離婚
雙方都不可再婚他人
妻子需保持獨身
丈夫需悔改
3）若因厭倦而離婚
是雙方的罪
應該：
→ 回頭和好
→ 恢復婚姻關係
📖 羅馬書 7:2–3
“女人有了丈夫…丈夫還活著，就被律法約束…”
“丈夫活著，她若歸於別人，便叫淫婦”
👉 重點：
只要配偶還活著，婚約仍然有效
**View 1: T.A.**
1. If separated due to abuse
They may live apart, but this is not a valid reason for remarriage
2. If divorce occurs
Neither party may remarry others
The wife must remain unmarried
The husband must repent
3. If divorced due to dissatisfaction
Both have sinned
They should:
→ Be reconciled
→ Restore the marriage
📖 Romans 7:2–3
“A woman is bound to her husband as long as he lives…”
“If she belongs to another man while her husband is alive, she is called an adulteress”
👉 Key Point:
As long as the spouse is alive, the marriage bond remains.
———
二、KTC 的觀點
非因姦淫離婚＝破壞神的婚約
結果：
→ 不可再婚
→ 必須終身獨身（直到對方死亡）
📖 希伯來書（婚姻是神聖的）
📖 馬太福音 19:9
“娶被休的婦人也是犯淫亂”
👉 強調：
婚約一旦破壞，不能再恢復為婚姻關係
**View 2: KTC**
Divorce not due to adultery = breaking God's covenant
Result:
→ No remarriage
→ Lifelong celibacy (until the other spouse dies)
📖 Hebrews (Marriage is sacred)
📖 Matthew 19:9
“Whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery”
👉 Emphasis:
Once the covenant is broken, it cannot be restored.
———
三、我的整理
KTC：
→ 終身獨身是悔改方式
T.A. / G.B. / J.G.：
→ 可以與原配和好（甚至再婚）
**My Summary**
KTC:
→ Lifelong celibacy is the form of repentance
T.A. / G.B. / J.G.:
→ Reconciliation with the original spouse (even remarriage)
———
✋ 關鍵經文問題：哥林多前書 7:10–11
📖
“妻子不可離開丈夫；
若是離開了，不可再嫁，或是仍同丈夫和好。”
**Key Passage: 1 Corinthians 7:10–11**
📖
“A wife must not separate from her husband;
but if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband.”
———
✊ 希臘文字分析（重點）
1）「離開」
希臘文：chorizo（G5563）
意思：分開、分離（不等於正式離婚）
📖 Vine 字典
→ 強調「分居 / 分離」，不是法律離婚
**Greek Word Study**
1. “Depart / Separate”
Greek: chorizo (G5563)
Meaning: separation, not legal divorce
📖 Vine’s Dictionary
→ Emphasizes separation, not formal divorce
———
2）「離婚」
希臘文：apoluo（G630）
📖 Strong
→ 明確用於「離婚」
👉 結論：
1 Cor 7:10-11 用的是「分開」，不是「離婚」
2. “Divorce”
Greek: apoluo (G630)
📖 Strong’s
→ Specifically refers to divorce
👉 Conclusion:
1 Cor 7:10–11 refers to separation, not divorce
———
✊ Johnson 的關鍵論證
1）經文稱「丈夫」
→ 表示婚姻仍存在
2）若已離婚
應稱「前夫」
→ 但經文沒有這樣說
3）因此
→ 她仍然是已婚狀態
4）“不可再嫁”
→ 指「不可嫁給別人」
不是不能回到丈夫
5）“和好”
→ 不是再婚
→ 是恢復原本婚姻
👉 核心結論：
她從來沒有真正脫離婚約
**Johnson’s Argument**
1. The text says “husband”
→ The marriage still exists
2. If divorced
He would be called “former husband”
→ But Scripture does not say that
3. Therefore
→ She is still married
4. “Remain unmarried”
→ Means not marrying another person
Not excluding reconciliation
5. “Reconcile”
→ Not remarriage
→ But restoring the existing marriage
👉 Core Conclusion:
She never truly left the marriage bond
———
✊ 補充：哥林多前書 7:15
📖
“不信的人若要離去，就由他離去…不必拘束”
爭議點：是否可再婚？
不同解釋：
DeHoff / Lipscomb：
→ 不可再婚
部分學者：
→ 若對方再婚，才可能釋放
👉 多數保守派結論：
→ 不允許再婚
**Supplement: 1 Corinthians 7:15**
📖
“If the unbeliever leaves, let him leave… the brother or sister is not under bondage”
Debate: remarriage?
Views:
DeHoff / Lipscomb:
→ No remarriage
Some scholars:
→ Freedom only if the other remarries
👉 Conservative conclusion:
→ Remarriage is not permitted
———
✊ 馬太福音 19:9 的核心邏輯
📖
“娶被休的婦人，也是犯姦淫”
原因：
👉 在神眼中，她仍屬於第一任丈夫
📖 羅馬書 7:2–3
再次支持「終身約束」
**Core Logic of Matthew 19:9**
📖
“Whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery”
Reason:
👉 In God’s eyes, she still belongs to her first husband
📖 Romans 7:2–3
Supports lifelong binding
———
✊ 我的神學掙扎（很重要）
問題核心：
1）若非姦淫離婚
→ 是否一生不得再婚？
2）若允許與原配再婚
→ 是否讓離婚變得輕率？
3）悔改的本質是什麼？
→ 和好？還是承擔後果（獨身）？
4）法院判決 vs 神的律法
→ 以哪個為準？
你的傾向：
✔ 神的律法高於法院
✔ 是否有姦淫才是關鍵
✔ 教會需要可證明的證據
**My Theological Struggle**
Key questions:
1. If not adultery
→ Must one remain single for life?
2. If remarriage to the same spouse is allowed
→ Does it trivialize divorce?
3. What is true repentance?
→ Reconciliation or lifelong consequence?
4. Court ruling vs God’s law
→ Which prevails?
Your inclination:
✔ God’s law is above human courts
✔ Actual adultery is the key issue
✔ The church requires verifiable evidence
———
✊ 最終整理（目前理解）
1）婚約在神面前是終身的（除非姦淫）
2）非姦淫離婚＝仍在婚約之中
3）不可與他人再婚
4）唯一正確方向：
→ 保持獨身
或
→ 與原配「和好」（不是再婚，而是恢復）
**Final Summary (Current Understanding)**
1. Marriage is lifelong before God (except for adultery)
2. Divorce without adultery does not break the bond
3. No remarriage to others
4. The only proper path:
→ Remain single
or
→ Be reconciled to the original spouse (not remarriage, but restoration)
留言
張貼留言